During his time at Ryerson, Stephen E. Makarewicz had no vested stocks or significant stock grants because the company's performance metrics were not met in key years like 2009, when he earned $529,430, primarily from salary. Interestingly, there were no...

During his time at Ryerson, Stephen E. Makarewicz had no vested stocks or significant stock grants because the company's performance metrics were not met in key years like 2009, when he earned $529,430, primarily from salary. Interestingly, there were no bonuses for him during this period, as the company aimed to align compensation with performance and shareholder interests. By 2010, his situation showed that while he was a prominent leader, the company's financial targets influenced his wealth, keeping him from benefiting financially from stock-related earnings. This illustrates how executive wealth can be closely tied to the company's success, which often is reflected in stock performance.